Should I Give Up Me To Not Lose You?
The following article is offered for free use in your ezine,
print publication or on your web site, so long as the author
resource box at the end is included, with hyperlinks.
Notification of publication would be appreciated.
Title: Should I Give Up Me To Not Lose You? Author: Margaret
Paul, Ph.D. E-mail: mailto:margaret@innerbonding.com Copyright:
© 2004 by Margaret Paul Web Address: http://www.innerbonding.com
Word Count: 793 Category: Relationships
SHOULD I GIVE UP ME TO NOT LOSE YOU? by Margaret Paul, Ph.D.
How far can you afford to bend your values to preserve your
relationship? How far can you go in giving yourself up to avoid
losing your partner? How much of yourself can you afford to
sacrifice to not lose someone you love? How do we find the
balance between maintaining our integrity and bending our
values?
Most relationships require us to bend to a certain extent, but
how much can we bend without a sense of loss of self?
There is an inherent paradox in these questions: A truly loving
relationship is a relationship where each person accepts and
even values the differences between them. If you have to
excessively bend your values to preserve the relationship, what
are you preserving? You are not preserving a loving relationship
since love does not demand that you excessively bend your values.
Rather than look at relationship in terms of bending values to
accommodate another person, let’s look at it in terms of each
person learning and growing as a result of their differences in
values.
For example, Patricia is a highly responsible person with a
strong work ethic, while Sam tends to let things go a lot, which
results in an imbalance regarding financial responsibility in
the relationship. Patricia is not happy about this. Does she
just accept these differences to preserve the relationship? No!
That is not what a good relationship is really about. Since a
good relationship is about each person learning and growing from
their differences, rather than one or both people giving
themselves up, Sam and Patricia need to engage in open
explorations about their differences. They each have beliefs
that can be explored, and in this process, new learning occurs
that leads to intrinsic change rather than superficial
compromise.
The real problem occurs when one or both partners are not
available for exploration and learning. If one partner says,
“Just accept me the way I am,” or gets angry or withdrawn when
the other partner attempts to discuss the situation, no learning
can take place. Then the other partner either has to accommodate
or leave – not a healthy situation.
Joe is extremely neat, while Julia has a hard time putting
things away. Roberta is always on time while Cecelia is always
late. Maggie is a spender while David is a saver. Carl has a
high sex drive while Andrea has a low sex drive. Angie is an
authoritarian parent while Curt is a permissive parent. Ronald
is highly social while Greg is a homebody. Depending upon
whether or not each person is open to learning, these
differences can lead to:
About the Author
Rating: Not yet rated
